As SSC CGL exam is approaching, numerous per users are asking same question that whether to point SSC or IBPS. Straight forward response to this question is SSC posts are greatly improved than bank employments. Here are reasons:-

1) Transfers: In IBPS PO/SO, you have to confront visit exchanges. One of my female companions who got put in Dena Bank, has a place with Ludhiana however set in Mumbai. In most recent two years she confronted 2 exchanges and it is exceptionally troublesome for a 23 years of age young lady to move to another state.

While in SSC there are sure posts where hopefuls are set just in Delhi. In the vast majority of the posts, recurrence of exchange is low. I have talked about SCC posts in my past post.

No bank acknowledges any demand to change posting area in initial two years of administration. So in the event that you have been chosen in IBPS PO III, hold up to set up gathering. May be you are living in Delhi and get set in Kerala. Yes, it is conceivable. I broke IBPS PO twice, I am from Ludhiana and once I set in Mumbai and second time I set in Bangalore. I didn't join. So on the off chance that you are truly genuine about PO then decide to leave from your home-city.

2) Social status: There is no legitimate explanation for this reality however being an Income Tax Inspector is greatly improved than a Bank PO. Posts in SSC are more respectable and stable.

3) No bond: In Bank PO, different banks request upto 3 years bond. While there is no such bond in the event of SSC posts. On the off chance that you show signs of improvement opportunity or you need to begin your own business or you are get ready for UPSC, you don't have to pay even a solitary penny while leaving the occupation in SSC.